# Importance Index of Components in Uncertain Reliability Systems

- Rong Gao
^{1}and - Kai Yao
^{2}Email author

**4**:7

**DOI: **10.1186/s40467-016-0047-y

© The Author(s) 2016

**Received: **5 July 2016

**Accepted: **9 September 2016

**Published: **21 October 2016

## Abstract

Importance measure is an index for estimating the importance of an individual component or a group of components in a reliability system. So far, the importance measures for components in stochastic reliability systems have been investigated. In order to calculate the importance of a component or a group of components in an uncertain reliability system, this paper proposes a new concept of importance index. Some formulas are given to calculate the importance index of a component and a group of components in an uncertain reliability system. Then, some special types of uncertain reliability systems such as uncertain series, parallel, parallel-series, series-parallel, bridge, and *k*-out-of-*n* systems are studied.

### Keywords

Uncertainty theory System reliability Importance index Uncertain variable Structure function## Introduction

The subject of the importance measure of components in a stochastic system has been developing for many years. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, reliability of a stochastic system was first presented and applied to some fields such as communication, transportation, and military systems. Along with the design for reliability, Birnbaum [2] proposed the concept of importance measure of components in a stochastic coherent reliability system. In reliability engineering, the importance measure is an index for estimating the relative importance of an individual component or a group of components in a stochastic system. Birnbaum classified the importance measure into three classes which are structure importance measure, reliability importance measure, and lifetime importance measure. Fussell [5] presented another importance measure for a component which is nonproportional to importance measure defined by Birnbaum [2]. Barlow and Proschan [1] came up with a type of time-independent lifetime importance measure of components in a stochastic system, which described the importance of a functioning component to the whole system. Natvig [26] proposed another type of time-independent lifetime importance to evaluate the possibility of a failing component leading to the failure of whole stochastic system. Recently, many researchers have applied importance measures into some specific stochastic reliability systems, such as Derman et al. [4], Kuo et al. [13], Kuo and Zuo [14], Kuo and Zhu [15] and Jalali et al. [12].

As is well known, randomness is a type of indeterminacy, which is modeled by probability theory. Probability theory has developed steadily for many years and has been widely applied in science and engineering. We usually make a basic assumption that the estimated probability and the long-run cumulative frequency are close enough when using probability theory. This implies that we should obtain a lot of observed data. However, observed data cannot always be obtained for technical or some other reasons, so we have to rely on domain experts to evaluate the belief degrees about the chances that the possible events may happen. Liu [25] showed that human beings usually estimate a much wider range of values than the object actually takes. That is, there is a large gap between the belief degrees estimated by human beings and the real frequencies. Hence, the belief degree cannot be modeled by probability measure. Some convincing examples may be found in Liu [24]. Naturally, we should find other mathematical tools to deal with the belief degree.

To deal with the experts’ belief degrees, Liu [17] founded uncertainty theory in 2007, and Liu [19] refined it in 2009 with presenting the product uncertain measure axiom for dealing with the operations of uncertain variables. Some fundamental concepts were presented by Liu [17], such as uncertain measure for indicating the belief degree, uncertain variable for modeling the uncertain quantity, and uncertainty distribution for describing an uncertain variable. Peng and Iwamura [27] studied a sufficient and necessary condition for a real function being the uncertainty distribution of an uncertain variable. Additionally, Liu [19] raised a concept of independence for uncertain variables. For ranking uncertain variables, Liu [17] proposed a concept of expected value operator. Up to now, uncertainty theory has been successfully applied to many problems such as, uncertain programming (Liu [20], Gao et al. [11]), uncertain risk and reliability analysis (Liu [22]), uncertain propositional logic (Li and Liu [16]), uncertain set (Liu [23]), uncertain process (Liu [18], Chen [3]), uncertain field (Gao and Chen [7]), uncertain finance (Liu [19]), uncertain differential equation (Liu [18], Gao [6]), and uncertain graph (Gao et al. [9], Gao and Qin [10]).

Based on uncertainty theory, Liu [21] investigated the system reliability, introducing a definition of reliability index and providing some useful formulas to calculate the reliability index. Then, Gao et al. [8] studied the reliability index of uncertain *k*-out-of-*n* systems. By the inspiration of importance measure associated with components in a stochastic system, a new concept of importance index for an individual component or a group of components in an uncertain reliability systems is introduced as a mathematical tool to model the importance of such a component in this paper.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Some basic concepts and properties with respect to uncertain variables and Boolean system are reviewed in the section “Preliminaries”. We devote the section “Importance Index of Individual Component” to presenting a new concept of importance index for an individual component in an uncertain reliability system and taking some examples to show how to calculate the importance index of a component. In the section “Importance Index of Group of Components,” a concept of importance index for a group of components in an uncertain reliability system is presented and some examples are also given to show how to calculate the importance index of a group of components. In the section “Main Results,” we provide some formulas to calculate the importance index of a component and a group of components in an uncertain reliability system. Finally, we make a summary of the full paper in the section “Conclusion”.

## Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce some fundamental concepts and properties concerning uncertain variables and Boolean systems.

### Uncertainty Variable

*Γ*be a nonempty set and \(\mathcal {L}\) a

*σ*-algebra over

*Γ*. Each element

*Λ*in \(\mathcal {L}\) is called an event. To deal with belief degree on the possibility of each event rationally, a concept of uncertain measure was given by Liu [17, 19] as a set function satisfying the following axioms:

###
**Definition 1**

*(Liu [*17

*])*An uncertain variable is a measurable function

*ξ*from an uncertainty space to a set of real numbers. That is, for any Borel set

*B*of real numbers, the set

The uncertain variables *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},⋯,*ξ*
_{
n
} are said to be independent if

holds for any Borel sets *B*
_{1},*B*
_{2},⋯,*B*
_{
n
}. For an uncertain variable *ξ*, the function
is called its uncertainty distribution.

###
**Theorem 1**

*(Liu [*21

*])*Assume that

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are some independent uncertain variables with continuous uncertainty distributions

*Φ*

_{1},

*Φ*

_{2},⋯,

*Φ*

_{ n }, respectively. Then, for an increasing function

*f*(

*x*

_{1},

*x*

_{2},⋯,

*x*

_{ n }), the uncertain variable

For ranking uncertain variables, the concept of expected value was proposed by Liu [17] in the following.

###
**Definition 2**

(Liu [17]) Let *ξ* be an uncertain variable. Then, the expected value of *ξ* is defined by

provided that at least one of the two integrals is finite.

###
**Theorem 2**

*ξ*be an uncertain variable with uncertainty distribution

*Φ*. If the expected value exists, then

### Boolean System

^{ n }to {0,1}. For example,

*x*

_{1},

*x*

_{2},

*x*

_{3}take values either 0 or 1. If an uncertain variable takes values either 0 or 1, then it is said to be Boolean. For example,

*b*is a number between 0 and 1.

###
**Theorem 3**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent Boolean uncertain variables,

*i*.

*e*.,

for *i*=1,2,⋯,*n*. Then, for a Boolean function *f*(*x*
_{1},*x*
_{2},⋯,*x*
_{
n
}), the Boolean uncertain variable *ξ*=*f*(*ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},⋯,*ξ*
_{
n
}) satisfies

*x*

_{ i }take values either 0 or 1 and

*ν*

_{ i }are defined by

*i*=1,2,⋯,

*n*, respectively.

*ξ*is a Boolean system with components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }. Then, a Boolean function

*f*is called a structure function of

*ξ*if

###
**Definition 3**

(Liu [22]) If the Boolean system is uncertain, the reliability index is the uncertain measure that the system is functioning, *i*.*e*.,

###
**Theorem 4**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }and has a structure function

*f*. If

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent and have reliabilities

*b*

_{1},

*b*

_{2},⋯,

*b*

_{ n }, respectively, then the reliability index is

*ξ*

_{ i }take values either 0 or 1, and

*ν*

_{ i }are defined by

*i*=1,2,⋯,

*n*, respectively.

###
**Example 1**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent and have reliabilities

*b*

_{1},

*b*

_{2},⋯,

*b*

_{ n }, respectively, then the reliability index is

###
**Example 2**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent and have reliabilities

*b*

_{1},

*b*

_{2},⋯,

*b*

_{ n }, respectively, then the reliability index is

###
**Example 3**

*k*-out-of-

*n*system containing

*n*components which functions if and only if at least

*k*components function, the structure function is

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent and have reliabilities

*b*

_{1},

*b*

_{2},⋯,

*b*

_{ n }, respectively, then the reliability index is

## Importance Index of Individual Component

The subject of importance measure for an individual component in a stochastic system has been developing for a long time. For investigating the importance of an individual component in an uncertain system, we present a new concept of importance index as follows.

###
**Definition 4**

Assume an uncertain Boolean system has components *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},⋯,*ξ*
_{
n
} and a structure function *f*. Then, the importance index of Component *i* is

The important index of Component *i* is the difference between the reliabilities of the uncertain system in two different cases: the former case is that Component *i* functions and the latter case is that Component *i* fails.

###
**Remark 1**

Importance index of a component in an uncertain system actually means the degree of importance of a component to the whole system. The higher the importance index of a component is, the more important it is to the whole system. For example, if the important index of a component is one, then it indicates that this component is indispensable to the system; if the important index of a component is zero, then it shows that this component is superfluous to the system. That implies that if we want to improve the reliability of a system, we have to ensure the normal operation of the components with higher importance index.

Important index can be applied into various fields to evaluate the relative importance of some components in an uncertain system. Their absolute values might not be as significant as their relative rankings. For example, in a large and complex pipeline network, there are pipelines without statistical information. These pipelines are used to transport various fluids from production sites to consumption ones and they are also essential components of such transportation network. The safe handling is of great importance due to the serious consequences of the faulty operations, such as the cracking of the welding seam and hole corrosion. So we should find a highly reliable route as well as the key components in such a route. That requires us to calculate the relative importance of the components in this pipeline network. Additionally, consider a complex electric vehicle which contains 100 powerful batteries without statistical information. This electric vehicle is required to last a long time and the power is significantly reduced if more than eight or nine batteries fail, which can be regarded as a 92/91-out-of-100 system. Thus, we should know which battery is relatively important. That asks us to know the importance index of the components in this electric battery system.

Next, we will use some specifically numerical examples to illustrate how to calculate the importance index of a component in an uncertain system.

###
**Example 4**

*4*components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4}, whose structure function is

Suppose *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},*ξ*
_{3},*ξ*
_{4} are independent and have reliabilities *0.2,0.7,0.9,0.4* in uncertain measure, respectively. Then, it follows from Definition 4 that the importance index of Component *3* is

###
**Example 5**

*4*components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4}, whose structure function is

Suppose *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},*ξ*
_{3},*ξ*
_{4} are independent and have reliabilities *0.2,0.7,0.9,0.4* in uncertain measure, respectively. Then, it follows from Definition 4 that the importance index of Component *3* is

###
**Example 6**

*4*components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4}. Assume each path functions if and only if its components function, and the system functions if and only if there is at least one functioning path. Then, the structure function of the parallel-series system is

Suppose *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},*ξ*
_{3},*ξ*
_{4} are independent and have reliabilities *0.2, 0.7, 0.9, 0.4* in uncertain measure, respectively. Then, it follows from Definition 4 that the importance index of Component *3* is

###
**Example 7**

*4*components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4}. Assume each path functions if and only if its components function, and the system functions if and only if there is at least one functioning path. Then, the structure function of the series-parallel system is

Suppose *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},*ξ*
_{3},*ξ*
_{4} are independent and have reliabilities *0.2, 0.7, 0.9, 0.4* in uncertain measure, respectively. Then, it follows from Definition 4 that the importance index of Component *3* is

###
**Example 8**

*5*components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4},

*ξ*

_{5}. Assume each path functions if and only if its components function, and the system functions if and only if there is at least one functioning path. Then, the structure function of the bridge system is

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},

*ξ*

_{3},

*ξ*

_{4},

*ξ*

_{5}are independent and have reliabilities

*0.2,0.7,0.9,0.8,0.4*in uncertain measure, respectively. Now, we will calculate the importance index of Component

*3*. Since

we have

according to Theorem 4. Then, it follows from Definition 3 that the reliability index of the system when Component *3* functions is

and the reliability index of the system when Component *3* fails is

Thus, the importance index of Component *3* is

according to the Definition 4.

The above examples clearly showed that the importance index of an individual component is related to the structure of the system.

## Importance Index of Group of Components

Sometimes, we need to know the importance of a group of components in an uncertain reliability system. Now, we give a concept of importance index for a group of components in an uncertain reliability system in this section.

###
**Definition 5**

Assume an uncertain Boolean system has components *ξ*
_{1},*ξ*
_{2},⋯,*ξ*
_{
n
} and a structure function *f*. Then, the importance index of a group of Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} is

The important index of the group of Components \(\xi _{i_{1}},\xi _{i_{2}},\cdots,\xi _{i_{l}}\) is the difference between the reliabilities of the uncertain system in two different cases: the former case is that Components \(\xi _{i_{1}},\xi _{i_{2}},\cdots,\xi _{i_{l}}\) function, and the latter case is that Components \(\xi _{i_{1}},\xi _{i_{2}},\cdots,\xi _{i_{l}}\) fail.

###
**Example 9**

(Series System) Consider the uncertain series system in Example 4. Then, it follows from Definition 5 that the importance index of Components *1* and *3* is

###
**Example 10**

(Parallel System) Consider the uncertain parallel system in Example 5. Then, it follows from Definition 5 that the importance index of Components *1* and *3* is

###
**Example 11**

(Parallel-Series System) Consider the uncertain parallel-series system in Example 6. Then, it follows from Definition 5 that the importance index of Components *1* and *3* is

###
**Example 12**

(Series-Parallel System) Consider the uncertain series-parallel system in Example 7. Then, it follows from Definition 5 that the importance index of Components *1* and *3* is

###
**Example 13**

*1*and

*3*. Since

we have

according to Theorem 4. Then, it follows from Definition 3 that the reliability index of the system when Components *1* and *3* function is

and the reliability index of the system when Components *1* and *3* fail is

Thus, the importance index of Components *1* and *3* is

according to the Definition 3.

The above examples clearly showed that the importance of a group of components is related to the structure of the system.

## Main Results

In this section, we propose some formulas to calculate the importance index for a component or a group of components in an uncertain reliability system.

### Formulas on Individual Component

Firstly, we give a formula to calculate the importance index for an individual component in an uncertain reliability system.

###
**Theorem 5**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }, and has a structure function

*f*. If the components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent and their reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively, then the importance index of Component

*i*is

*ξ*

_{ j }take values either

*0*or

*1*and

*ν*

_{ j }are defined by

for *j*=1,2,⋯,*n*, respectively.

###
*Proof*

This theorem follows from Theorem 4 directly. □

###
**Corollary 1**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*is

###
*Proof*

If Component *i* functions, then the reliability index of the system is

And if Component *i* fails, then the reliability index of the system is

*i*is

The proof is complete. □

###
**Corollary 2**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*is

###
*Proof*

If Component *i* functions, then the reliability index of the system is

And if Component *i* fails, then the reliability index of the system is

*i*is

The proof is complete. □

###
**Corollary 3**

*k*-out-of-

*n*system with independent uncertain components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*is

*a*

_{1},⋯,

*a*

_{ i−1},

*a*

_{ i+1}⋯,

*a*

_{ n }]=1 and

*n*− max[

*a*

_{1},⋯,

*a*

_{ i−1},

*a*

_{ i+1}⋯,

*a*

_{ n }]=0.

###
*Proof*

If Component *i* functions, then the reliability index of the system is

and if Component *i* fails, then the reliability index of the system is

*i*is

The proof is complete. □

### Formulas on Group of Components

Sometimes, we need to know the importance index of a group of components in an uncertain reliability system. Now, we give a formula to calculate the importance index of a group of components in an uncertain reliability system.

###
**Theorem 6**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }, and has a structure function

*f*. If components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }are independent, and their reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively, then the importance index of the group of Components

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

*ξ*

_{ j }take values either

*0*or

*1*, and

*ν*

_{ j }are defined by

for *j*=1,2,⋯,*n*, respectively.

###
**Corollary 4**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

###
*Proof*

If Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} function, the reliability index of the system is

And if Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} fail, the reliability index of the system is

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

The proof is complete. □

###
**Corollary 5**

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

###
*Proof*

If Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} function, then the reliability index of the system is

And if Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} fail, then the reliability index of the system is

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

The proof is complete. □

###
**Corollary 6**

*k*-out-of-

*n*system with independent uncertain components

*ξ*

_{1},

*ξ*

_{2},⋯,

*ξ*

_{ n }whose reliabilities are

*a*

_{1},

*a*

_{2},⋯,

*a*

_{ n }, respectively. Note that the structure function has a Boolean form

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

###
*Proof*

If Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} function, then the reliability index of the system is

and if Components *i*
_{1},*i*
_{2},⋯,*i*
_{
l
} fail, then the reliability index of the system is

*i*

_{1},

*i*

_{2},⋯,

*i*

_{ l }is

## Conclusion

Inspired by the investigation of importance measure for components in a stochastic reliability system, this paper put forward a new concept of importance index for an individual component or a group of components in an uncertain reliability system. Several systems including series, parallel, parallel-series, series-parallel, and bridge systems are investigated to illustrate this concept for a component or a group of components. Then, some formulas were derived to calculate the importance index. Based on this results, we would study the lifetime importance index of a component in an uncertain system in the future.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61573210 and 61403360).

### Authors’ contributions

RG carried out the study in the paper and drafted the first version of the manuscript. RG and KY designed the framework together. KY revised the first version of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Barlow, RE, Proschan, F: Importance of system components and fault tree events. Stoch. Process. Appl. 3(2), 153–173 (1975).MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Birnbaum, ZW: On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. J. Multivar. Anal. 2, 581–592 (1969).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Chen, XW: Variation analysis of uncertain stationary independent increment processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(2), 312–316 (1969).MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Derman, C, Lieberman, GJ, Ross, SM: On the consecutive-
*k*-out-of-*n*: F system. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 31(1), 57–63 (1982).View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Fussell, JB: How to hand-calculate system reliability and safety characteristics. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 24(3), 169–174 (1975).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao, R: Milne method for solving uncertain differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 274, 774–785 (2016).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Gao, R, Chen, XW: Some concepts and properties of uncertain fields. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. doi:10.3233/JIFS-16314.
- Gao, Y, Gao, R, Yang, LX: Order statistics of uncertain variables. J. Uncertain. Anal. Appl. 3(Article. 1) (2015).Google Scholar
- Gao, Y, Yang, LX, Shukai, Li, Samarjit, Kar: On distribution function of the diameter in uncertain graph. Inf. Sci. 296, 61–74 (2015).MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao, Y, Qin, ZF: On computing the edge-connectivity of an uncertain graph. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24(4), 981–991 (2016).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao, Y, Yang, LX, Shukai, Li: Uncertain models on railway transportation planning problem. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 4921–4934 (2016).MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jalali, A, Hawkes, AG, Cui, LR, Hwang, FK: The optimal consecutive-
*k*-out-of-*n*: G line for*n*≤2*k*. J. Plan. Infer. 128, 281–287 (2005).MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kuo, W, Zhang, W, Zuo, MJ: A consecutive
*k*-out-of-*n*: G system: the mirror image of a consecutive*k*-out-of-*n*: F system. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 39(2), 244–253 (1990).View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kuo, W, Zuo, MJ: Optimal reliability modeling: principles and applications. Wiley, New York (2003).Google Scholar
- Kuo, W, Zhu, XY: Importance measures in reliability, risk, and optimization: principles and applications. Wiley, London (2012).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li, X, Liu, B: Hybrid logic and uncertain logic. J. Uncertain Syst. 3(2), 83–94 (2009).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Uncertainty theory. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2007).View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Liu, B: Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process. J. Uncertain Syst. 2(1), 3–16 (2008).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Some research problems in uncertainty theory. J. Uncertain Syst. 3(1), 3–10 (2009).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Theory and practice of uncertain programming. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2009).View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Liu, B: Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2010).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu, B: Uncertain risk analysis and uncertain reliability analysis. J. Uncertain Syst. 4(3), 163–170 (2010).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Uncertain set theory and uncertain inference rule with application to uncertain control. J. Uncertain Syst. 3(4), 243–251 (2010).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Why is there a need for uncertainty theory?J. Uncertain Syst. 6(Article. 1), 3–10 (2012).Google Scholar
- Liu, B: Uncertainty theory. 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2015).View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Natvig, B: A suggestion of a new measusure of imporance of system component. Stoch. Process. Appl. 9(3), 319–330 (1979).MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Peng, ZX, Iwamura, K: A sufficient and necessary condition of uncertainty distribution. J. Interdiscip. Math. 13(3), 277–285 (2010).MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar